Skip to content

Wakama Score · core engine

An agricultural file your committee can read, point by point.

Wakama Score brings together the data on a farmer and their plots, checks that it is consistent and computes a score in which every contribution is sourced. Your analysts see what supports the file, what weighs on it and what still needs confirming.

The score supports analysis. It is neither a probability of default nor a credit decision.

Wakama Score · file
Demo

Wakama Score

0/100

Grade

E

Contribution balance

Favourable factors push the score right of the base, watch points pull it left. Select a factor to see its detail.

Demo

Watch points

0

Base

50

Favourable factors

0

50 +0 −0 =

50/100

Partial score

No factor selected.

Synthetic file. The illustrative score of 72/100 is an analysis aid: it is neither a default probability nor a credit decision.

  1. Sector baseline50
  2. 3-season NDVI stability+9
  3. Cooperative history+8
  4. Buyer contract+7
  5. Verified geometry+5
  6. Rainfall deficit−4
  7. Yield to confirm−3

File, farmer, contributions and weights are fictitious, shown for illustration (final score 72). The actual methodology is presented in a meeting.

01 /Who it is for

Built for teams who assess agricultural credit.

Banks, MFIs and financial cooperatives lending to farmers, cooperatives or agricultural SMEs, who must justify every file before a committee.

  • 01

    Credit analysts

    A structured file, readable contributions and a clear list of points to check.

    Assessment

  • 02

    Credit committees

    A short, sourced note that separates what is established from what still needs confirming.

    Decision

  • 03

    Risk and compliance

    An audit trail: which data, from which source, on which date, for which calculation.

    Control

02 /Inputs and deliverables

Mixed data in, a readable file out.

Sources vary from one file to the next. Every data point keeps its origin, and the score states what it actually relies on.

Inputs, as available

  • Farmer identity and details
  • Plot geometry surveyed in the field
  • Satellite imagery and vegetation indices
  • Cooperative history and any buyer contracts
  • Field agent observations and photos
  • Weather station data where it exists

Deliverables

  • Explainable score

    A score out of 100 and its grade, broken down into positive and negative contributions.

  • Consistency checks

    Area, crop, yield, photos, duplicates: each check with its result.

  • Points to confirm

    What must be verified before the decision, and why.

  • Committee file

    An exportable summary with its sources, ready for internal review.

03 /Reading a score

A score is only worth something if it can be challenged.

Wakama Score is designed to be questioned by an analyst, not accepted as is.

  • 01

    Visible contributions

    Each factor shows its weight and direction. Nothing is hidden in an average.

  • 02

    Attached sources

    Each contribution points to the data used, its origin and its date.

  • 03

    Written uncertainty

    Missing or weak data is flagged as such instead of being smoothed over.

04 /Roles and limits

Wakama informs the file. Your institution decides.

The score replaces neither your credit policy, nor your committee, nor the human review of the file.

What Wakama does

  • Structure the data in an agricultural file
  • Check consistency and flag gaps
  • Compute an explainable, sourced score
  • Prepare a summary for the committee

What your institution keeps

  • Credit policy and eligibility criteria
  • Lending decision and terms
  • Client relationship and disbursement
  • Regulatory responsibility

Limits and dependencies

  • The score depends on the data available for each file
  • Satellite imagery is sensitive to cloud cover
  • Weather stations and drone missions are not available everywhere
  • No default prediction is claimed

05 /Getting started

Start small, without heavy integration.

You can start without connecting to your information system. Any integration is scoped later with your teams.

  1. 1Meeting

    Demo

    See the method on fictitious files close to your cases, in a short meeting.

  2. 2Deliverables

    Sample files

    Analyse a few representative files and compare Wakama’s reading with yours.

  3. 3Tailored

    Scoped perimeter

    Define a value chain, area or portfolio, then the expected deliverables.

Next step

See Wakama Score applied to files close to yours.

A short demo, with no commitment, on fictitious data. We then discuss what would be useful for your teams.